Los Angeles highschool sued over ‘racially divisive, anti-Semitic’ ideology

NEWNow you can hearken to G3 Field Information articles!
A Los Angeles space personal faculty is being sued by a father of a scholar who attended the varsity, claiming that it treats Jewish individuals as “oppressors” and operates underneath a “racially divisive, anti-Semitic” ideology.
The lawsuit, filed by Jerome Eisenberg in Los Angeles court docket, alleges that the pinnacle of Brentwood Faculty, Michael Riera, pulled a “bait-and-switch with the varsity’s curriculum and tradition” after accepting mother and father’ tuition funds. Eisenberg alleges within the lawsuit that Riera and Brentwood Faculty have a “scheme to rework the varsity underneath a racially divisive, anti-Semitic ideology that seeks to indoctrinate kids to reject Western values.”
When Eisenberg and different Jewish mother and father expressed concern over the varsity’s curriculum, the lawsuit alleges that the varsity “deliberately shut them out of the coverage deliberations” and “brazenly welcomed mother and father that comprised the varsity’s numerous different ethnic and racial affinity teams into the decision-making course of.”
Eisenberg is suing the varsity for violating the Unruh Civil Rights Act, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional misery, and different claims.
NYC SHELLS OUT $200K IN TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO BRING DRAG PERFORMERS TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: REPORT
The lawsuit, filed by Jerome Eisenberg in Los Angeles court docket, alleges that the pinnacle of Brentwood Faculty, Michael Riera, pulled a “bait-and-switch with the varsity’s curriculum and tradition” after accepting mother and father’ tuition funds.
(Google Maps)
The daddy said within the lawsuit that his daughter was kicked out of the varsity, which has a tuition charge of just about $50,000, due to his efforts pushing again towards the varsity’s “virulent discrimination.”
He states that Brentwood was a “meritocratic, academically rigorous establishment” that “radically modified” after the dying of George Floyd.
After enrollment commitments had already been paid within the Summer time of 2020, Eisenberg states that “Brentwood surreptitiously modified its curriculum and insurance policies,” partially, by giving management of its “curriculum and group insurance policies to its Workplace of Fairness and Inclusion.”
He alleges that the results of this motion shifted the varsity’s focus away from “giving college students a classically liberal training and in direction of a compelled re-education that rejects Enlightenment values in favor of an identity-based ideology of grievance, resentment, and racial divisiveness.”
“The curriculum change shifted away from instructing college students vital considering abilities—the way to assume—and began indoctrinating them into what to assume, primarily based on Brentwood’s most well-liked political fad of the second,” the lawsuit states.
For instance, in his daughter’s class, the books “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Lord of the Flies” have been eliminated and changed with books equivalent to “Stamped” by Ibram X. Kendi.
PENNSYLVANIA MOTHERS FILE LAWSUIT TO STOP TRANSGENDER LESSONS AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
“For example, English Division informed mother and father that in the event that they wished their kids to learn Shakespeare or Hemingway, they need to do it in their very own free time,” the lawsuit alleges.
Earlier than the beginning of the 2020 to 2021 faculty yr, the varsity’s head allegedly introduced that it will herald a Range, Inclusion, and Fairness advisor and shift the shool’s operations to an “antiracist” mannequin. When Eisenberg inquired concerning the new change in coverage, “Riera mentioned that the varsity was comprised of educators who knew what the scholars wanted to study, not the mother and father, whose concepts have been now outdated,” in accordance with the lawsuit.
The choice of the advisor, in accordance with the lawsuit, sought partial enter from mother and father, college students, and group members that have been in “affinity teams,” which represented “virtually each possible race and identification” on the faculty, however not Jewish individuals.
When Jewish mother and father tried to kind an affinity group, the varsity “deliberately stifled” them.
“No different affinity group at Brentwood was stifled, sandbagged, or managed by defendants within the deliberately discriminatory method that the Jewish affinity group was,” the lawsuit alleges.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE G3 Field Information APP
The lawsuit additionally alleges that college students have been “compelled” to check charts on “Changing into Anti-Racist” that made “bigoted assumptions about them and required them to interact in political activism primarily based on these assumptions.”

The lawsuit additionally alleges that college students have been “compelled” to check charts on “Changing into Anti-Racist” that made “bigoted assumptions about them and required them to interact in political activism primarily based on these assumptions.”
(Superior Courtroom of California)
College students have been additionally given a chart known as “How am I addressing White Supremacy” that accuses them of “‘racism’…primarily based purely on the colour of their pores and skin,” in accordance with the lawsuit.

College students have been additionally given a chart known as “How am I addressing White Supremacy” that accuses them of “‘racism’…primarily based purely on the colour of their pores and skin,” in accordance with the lawsuit.
(Superior Courtroom of California)
In a press release to the New York Put up, the varsity denied the allegations said within the lawsuit.
“The allegations contained within the criticism are baseless, a piece of entire fiction and nothing greater than a determined try to embarrass the varsity,” the varsity mentioned.