Roe v. Wade: Megan Rapinoe slams final decision as ‘violent onslaught on women’s bodies’

NEWYou can now pay attention to G3 Box News posts!

The Supreme Courtroom conclusion overturning Roe v. Wade has produced rising quantities of factually inaccurate, unhinged reactions from quite a few prominent voices across the sports activities and entertainment world.

Soccer star Megan Rapinoe unsurprisingly contributed to the bewildering redefinition of language in her assertion on the ruling:

Click In this article FOR Far more Sporting activities Coverage ON G3 Box News

Megan Rapinoe #15 of the United States seems to be on for the duration of a WNT Summer months Collection recreation versus Nigeria at Q2 Stadium on June 16, 2021 in Austin, Texas.
(Brad Smith/ISI Pictures/Getty Pictures)

“I just just can’t understate how unfortunate, and how cruel this is. I think the cruelty is the level. Because this is not pro-lifestyle by any signifies. This way of considering, or political belief, is coupled with a entire deficiency of inspiration around gun rules, it will come with pro-loss of life penalty, it comes with anti-healthcare, anti-prenatal care, anti-childcare, anti-pre-K, anti-food stuff support, anti-welfare, anti-instruction, anti-maternity depart, anti-paternity depart.

“This is not pro-daily life. And it is incredibly annoying and disheartening, and frankly just infuriating to listen to that be the rationale that individuals are seeking to conclusion abortion legal rights, and close this vital facet of a woman’s — not only healthcare and typical essential basic safety in this region, but her bodily autonomy, and the suitable to flexibility, and the pursuit of happiness and liberty, is being assaulted in this occasion. And it is just extremely disheartening.”

Even if you agree with abortion, characterizing a decision that does very little to prohibit abortions as “cruel” is absurd and purposefully inaccurate. The Courtroom is just returning to the states to the means to ascertain for them selves, as a result of legislation, what the policies must be in their condition.

Rapinoe also evidently believes that killing unborn babies does not in any circumstance fulfill the definition of “cruel,” and that the risk of a lot more children becoming born is not “professional-lifetime.”

United States' Megan Rapinoe kneels prior to the women's bronze medal soccer match against Australia at the 2020 Summer Olympics, Thursday, Aug. 5, 2021, in Kashima, Japan.

United States’ Megan Rapinoe kneels prior to the women’s bronze medal soccer match from Australia at the 2020 Summer Olympics, Thursday, Aug. 5, 2021, in Kashima, Japan.
(G3 Box News Photo/Fernando Vergara)

She went further more, placing the blame on all gentlemen for the Supreme Court interpreting the Constitution in a way that she disagrees with:


You are permitting a violent and consistent onslaught on the autonomy of women’s bodies, on women’s rights, on women’s minds, on our hearts, on our souls,’ Rapinoe reported when requested what her information to adult males, as a monolith, would be. ‘We are living in a nation that for good tries to chip away at what you have enabled, at what you have been privileged adequate to sense your full existence.

The actuality that this style of rhetoric is encouraged and promoted by glowing media stories celebrating her bravery and “emotional response” is outrageous and inexcusable.

Beyond the ridiculous hyperbole that everyone who disagrees with her stance is professional “cruelty,” she engages in the very same hypocrisy we typically see from people who share her ideology.

According to Rapinoe, her human body and other women’s bodies are beneath assault, but as Katie Pavlich astutely details out, she’d have no reply if questioned to describe what a girl truly is:

Gals to Rapinoe are resources to be utilised and discarded as vital. When it fits her demands, she’s a intense advocate for what she decides to be women’s rights. Nonetheless when it will come to primary concepts of biology and fairness in levels of competition, she’s extra than content to erase them.

None of this is about guarding women’s rights, it is about political posturing. Rapinoe’s ideology requires that she have interaction in the unavoidable hypocrisy of declaring to treatment about females when getting unable to outline them. And she’s more than pleased to oblige.

To her, it’s in some way not a “violent and steady onslaught on the autonomy of women’s bodies” when organic adult men transition, contend in women’s leagues and physically dominate their opponents.

Arguing that the Supreme Court docket conclusion is an assault on women’s bodies is considerably considerably less persuasive when you simply cannot even agree on what a woman’s body basically is.

Activists flocked to the Supreme Court following the overturn of Roe v. Wade on Friday June 24, 2022. (G3 Box News Digital/Lisa Bennatan)

Activists flocked to the Supreme Court docket subsequent the overturn of Roe v. Wade on Friday June 24, 2022. (G3 Box News Digital/Lisa Bennatan)

Simply click Here TO GET THE G3 Box News App

Whether or not you consider the Court’s ruling was justified, Rapinoe’s model of inaccurate, hypocritical activism is nonetheless an additional instance of the absurd contradictions at the coronary heart of fashionable progressive ideology.

Related Articles

Back to top button